Nature study: Wikipedia as unreliable as Brittanica

Subject: Nature study: Wikipedia as unreliable as Brittanica
From: "Simon North" <Simon -dot- North -at- quintiq -dot- com>
To: <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com>
Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2005 16:40:53 +0100

Well, actually, the Nature article says that Wikipedia is as reliable as
Brittanica ...
but having spent a fortune a few years ago on buying the hard copy of
Brittanica,
I'm a little disappointed that Brittanica comes out so badly.

Read the statistics:
http://www.nature.com/news/2005/051212/multimedia/438900a_m1.html

Simon North


Quintiq Application Software BV
's Hertogenbosch, The Netherlands
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Now Shipping -- WebWorks ePublisher Pro for Word! Easily create online
Help. And online anything else. Redesigned interface with a new
project-based workflow. Try it today! http://www.webworks.com/techwr-l

Doc-To-Help 2005 now has RoboHelp Converter and HTML Source: Author
content and configure Help in MS Word or any HTML editor. No
proprietary editor! *August release. http://www.componentone.com/TECHWRL/DocToHelp2005

---
You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- infoinfocus -dot- com -dot-

To unsubscribe send a blank email to
techwr-l-unsubscribe -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
or visit http://lists.techwr-l.com/mailman/options/techwr-l/archive%40infoinfocus.com

Send administrative questions to lisa -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.techwr-l.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.


Previous by Author: Re: what are you working on today
Next by Author: Re: New Poll Question
Previous by Thread: RE: Text in Word Table cells won't wrap?
Next by Thread: Re: Formatting Docs On-The-Fly


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads


Sponsored Ads