Re: Documentation Review process - client feedback

Subject: Re: Documentation Review process - client feedback
From: Janice Gelb <janice -dot- gelb -at- sun -dot- com>
To: TECHWR-L <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com>
Date: Mon, 09 Jan 2006 10:46:11 -0800

Al Geist wrote:

Gene Kim-Eng wrote:

I would also watermark every
single page of the review doc with something to that effect in the event
of printing or copying.

I second that. Even with a watermark, you will find some idiot sending out copies some "friend" who has "given them their word they won't send it to anyone else" only to have both existing and potential customers calling several weeks later about something they found in the "new" manual. If you have "PRELIMINARY" in light gray or red at a 45 degree angle across each and every page, covers included, it won't stop those idiots from sending our copies, but at least the recipient gets the idea not to trust the contents just yet.


We add a confidentiality footer to every page, which
is often easier on production although obviously not
as blatantly effective.

-- Janice
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Now Shipping -- WebWorks ePublisher Pro for Word! Easily create online
Help. And online anything else. Redesigned interface with a new
project-based workflow. Try it today! http://www.webworks.com/techwr-l

Doc-To-Help 2005 now has RoboHelp Converter and HTML Source: Author content and configure Help in MS Word or any HTML editor. No proprietary editor! *August release. http://www.componentone.com/TECHWRL/DocToHelp2005

---
You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- infoinfocus -dot- com -dot-
To unsubscribe send a blank email to techwr-l-unsubscribe -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
or visit http://lists.techwr-l.com/mailman/options/techwr-l/archive%40infoinfocus.com

To subscribe, send a blank email to techwr-l-join -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com

Send administrative questions to lisa -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.techwr-l.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.


References:
RE: Documentation Review process - client feedback: From: Bonnie Granat
Re: Documentation Review process - client feedback: From: Gene Kim-Eng
Re: Documentation Review process - client feedback: From: Al Geist

Previous by Author: Re: Gender neutrality and the multiple-personality third-person pronoun
Next by Author: Re: The non-learning organization?
Previous by Thread: Re: Documentation Review process - client feedback
Next by Thread: Sometimes we get our validated


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads