Re: software question

Subject: Re: software question
From: Al Geist <al -dot- geist -at- geistassociates -dot- com>
To: techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
Date: Sat, 18 Feb 2006 09:39:46 -0500

Michele Davis wrote:

Maybe the climate is different in Sarah's neck of the woods, but I can assuredly state (esp. after writing 11 books for publishers all over the globe) that understanding packages such as Framemaker is an absolute if you want to consult. Most of my publishers also use Frame in production. I think that attests to the strength of Frame.

While understanding FrameMaker opens up new areas of consulting, I would have to say that a majority of companies I've worked with use Word, or either PageMaker or InDesign. (Yep, there are still a lot of PageMaker based companies out there.) Most of these are smaller and while they understand the need for documentation, they do not have the resources to hire a TW full time and they want the end product in a format that they can update through the product's life cycle.

The cost of FrameMaker is also a disincentive for many smaller companies. A former employer was Word and PageMaker based and has since migrated to InDesign because the cost and steep learning curve for Frame was not cost effective. They moved to InDesign because it could be used by both the TW and the Marketing Department, and the learning curve was relatively shallow.

A lot of companies are also using online (or disc based) documentation (PDF or Help) which can be accomplished using programs such as Doc-to-Help. Since virtually every Windows-based computer system comes with Word, it allows companies to have the engineer write up a draft description in Word, then hand the package off to a contracting TW or Help developer. So, you can do quite well without FrameMaker; however, having FrameMaker skills will definitely open up doors to those larger companies (and subsequently, more lucrative contracts).

Additionally, as a JD grad. if you need contract help go to an attorney, don't just willy-nilly add stuff to an existing contract. Platform issues should never be part of a contract, but should have their own Exhibit in your contract. Just my judicial opinion.

I totally agree with Michele. Trying to be your own lawyer will only get you in trouble. If in doubt, spend a few bucks to have a lawyer look over your contract, including any additions/deletions you wish to implement.

Al Geist, Geist Associates
Technical Writing, Online Help, Marketing Collateral, Web Design, Award Winning Videos, Professional Photography
Office: 802-658-3140

Cell: 505-400-4128
E-mail: al -dot- geist -at- geistassociates -dot- com <mailto:al -dot- geist -at- geistassociates -dot- com>
URL: <> (online portfolio/resume)

See also:
URL: <> (fine art prints for home or office and note cards for all occasions)

"When the situation is absolutely hopeless, you have nothing to worry about."
Compliments of The Monkey Wrench Gang


WebWorks ePublisher Pro for Word features support for every major Help
format plus PDF, HTML and more. Flexible, precise, and efficient content delivery. Try it today!.
Doc-To-Help includes a one-click RoboHelp project converter. It's that easy. Watch the demo at

You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- infoinfocus -dot- com -dot-
To unsubscribe send a blank email to techwr-l-unsubscribe -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
or visit

To subscribe, send a blank email to techwr-l-join -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com

Send administrative questions to lisa -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit for more resources and info.

software question: From: Mary Elizabeth
Re: software question: From: Siliconwriter
Re: software question: From: Michele Davis

Previous by Author: Re: software question
Next by Author: Re: software question
Previous by Thread: Re: software question
Next by Thread: Re: software question

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads