TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: Tolerance in text From:Geoff Lane <geoff -at- gjctech -dot- co -dot- uk> To:TECHWR-L <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com> Date:Tue, 21 Feb 2006 14:27:38 +0000
On Tuesday, February 21, 2006, Links, Diederik wrote;
> I _obviously_ prefer the first one.
> Because the '±'-sign means 'approximately' (the hole can be 24 mm or
> 26 mm) and not 'plus or minus' (the hole must be between 24.8 mm and
> 25.2 mm).
In my book, "±" specifies a tolerance. The notation that I've used
both as a marine engineer and as a tech writer is to specify the
nominal dimension, then the maximum oversize, then the maximum
undersize. So, you could write, "25 mm + 0.2 mm / - 0.2 mm".
- Where the oversize and undersize tolerances are the same, you can
combine them using "±", so you could write "25 mm ± 0.2 mm".
- Using the first notation, where either the undersize or oversize
tolerance is omitted, it is assumed to be zero.
So, "25 mm - 0.2 mm", "25 mm / - 0.2 mm", and "25 mm + / - 0.2 mm"
all mean "25 mm + 0.0 mm / - 0.2 mm".
That said, the most common form specifies both tolerances explicitly
where they are unequal and most people now take "25 +/- 0.2" to mean
"25 plus or minus 0.2" even if it isn't strictly correct. Thus, using
"+/-" is ambiguous and probably should be avoided.
Don't omit the units from the nominal dimension because that too can
be ambiguous. For example, does "25 ± 0.2 mm" have a nominal dimension
of 25 mm, 25 cm, or something else?
Perhaps as important is implied tolerance. Any dimension has an
implicit rounding tolerance. So, "25 mm" actually means
"25 mm + 0.49 mm / - 0.50 mm" because any dimension in that range
rounds to 25 mm to the nearest millimetre, which is the accuracy
implied by omitting the first decimal place.
So, IMO, "25.0 mm ± 0.20 mm" is the best way of writing the tolerances
you need without introducing ambiguity.
WebWorks ePublisher Pro for Word features support for every major Help
format plus PDF, HTML and more. Flexible, precise, and efficient content
delivery. Try it today!. http://www.webworks.com/techwr-l