Re: Tolerance in text
I agreee with what Dick is saying.
However, is it okay to changes engineering specifications to an average number just to make the tolerances the same for high and low tolerances?
The change in notation I offered is mathematically identical to the notation I converted.
While the average may be correct, if it were referenced back to some work instructions, procedures, and diagrams, would the document correctly reflect the stated dimensions and tolerances?
I say yes, and I've faced down engineers on bigger issues than this more than once.
In my past line of work, I think the engineers would threow a hissy fit for not documenting the dimension as it is called out in the technical specifications...
I've had any number of engineers throw hissy fits; but once they've gotten that out of their systems, they've always ended up accepting my suggested simplifications/clarifications/corrections. Even the arrogant ones eventually look in the mirror and realize that, as engineers, their true nature is to embrace improvement.
WebWorks ePublisher Pro for Word features support for every major Help
format plus PDF, HTML and more. Flexible, precise, and efficient content delivery. Try it today!. http://www.webworks.com/techwr-l
Doc-To-Help includes a one-click RoboHelp project converter. It's that easy. Watch the demo at http://www.componentone.com/TECHWRL/DocToHelp2005
You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- infoinfocus -dot- com -dot-
To unsubscribe send a blank email to techwr-l-unsubscribe -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
or visit http://lists.techwr-l.com/mailman/options/techwr-l/archive%40infoinfocus.com
To subscribe, send a blank email to techwr-l-join -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
Send administrative questions to lisa -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.techwr-l.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.
Search our Technical Writing Archives & Magazine