Tested by the QA Ddepartment - was: Re: Most annoying word
Jennifer Baldwin moaned:
When we make changes to the softw...er, I mean solution, it is "QAed," which is a lot like being "tested."
I almost hate to inject a note of semi-seriousness into this conversation, but I use QAed, as does everybody around here. It's compact and efficient and gets the job done.
The job is to indicate "tested by QA department", as opposed to sanity-checked, or unit-tested, or beta-tested, or tested by Product Verification, or...
All of those are ways that [potential] product gets tested before it ever reaches QA.
If you have a better way, bring it on. I'm happy to oblige.
WebWorks ePublisher Pro for Word features support for every major Help
format plus PDF, HTML and more. Flexible, precise, and efficient content delivery. Try it today!. http://www.webworks.com/techwr-l
Doc-To-Help includes a one-click RoboHelp project converter. It's that easy. Watch the demo at http://www.componentone.com/TECHWRL/DocToHelp2005
You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- infoinfocus -dot- com -dot-
To unsubscribe send a blank email to techwr-l-unsubscribe -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
or visit http://lists.techwr-l.com/mailman/options/techwr-l/archive%40infoinfocus.com
To subscribe, send a blank email to techwr-l-join -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
Send administrative questions to lisa -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.techwr-l.com/techwhirl/ for more resources and info.
RE: Most annoying word: From: mlist
Search our Technical Writing Archives & Magazine