Re: Recruiters without clues

Subject: Re: Recruiters without clues
From: "Gene Kim-Eng" <techwr -at- genek -dot- com>
To: <arroxaneullman -at- aol -dot- com>, <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com>
Date: Thu, 9 Mar 2006 09:51:19 -0800

My online profiles are all confidential, so replying to someone who
cluelessly spams my redirect just because a couple of key words
came up in a search provides them with my name and direct email address. I respond with the Delete button.

Gene Kim-Eng

----- Original Message ----- From: <arroxaneullman -at- aol -dot- com>

Would you have responded to the recruiter? If so, how? Moreover, am I over-reacting?


WebWorks ePublisher Pro for Word features support for every major Help
format plus PDF, HTML and more. Flexible, precise, and efficient content delivery. Try it today!.
Doc-To-Help includes a one-click RoboHelp project converter. It's that easy. Watch the demo at

You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- infoinfocus -dot- com -dot-
To unsubscribe send a blank email to techwr-l-unsubscribe -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
or visit

To subscribe, send a blank email to techwr-l-join -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com

Send administrative questions to lisa -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit for more resources and info.

Recruiters without clues: From: arroxaneullman

Previous by Author: Re: Credit where credit is due??
Next by Author: Re: Recruiters without clues
Previous by Thread: Re: Recruiters without clues
Next by Thread: RE: Recruiters without clues

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads