Re: Tech writing saves journalism

Subject: Re: Tech writing saves journalism
From: "Gene Kim-Eng" <techwr -at- genek -dot- com>
To: "Fetzner, Bill" <BFetzner -at- amsuper -dot- com>, "'Dubin, David'" <David -dot- Dubin -at- sage -dot- com>, <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com>
Date: Thu, 25 May 2006 13:14:14 -0700

Neither is remotely likely, unless someone could demonstrate that the user suffered unreasonable harm due to the lack of documentation. Anybody you know been injured because they couldn't find usable instructions for using some feature in their cellphone or digital camera that the manufacturer
promised would save their lives or protect them from injury?

Gene Kim-Eng

----- Original Message ----- From: "Fetzner, Bill" <BFetzner -at- amsuper -dot- com>

I think that lawyers would place these two kinds of infractions in the
categories of nonfeasance and malfeasance.


WebWorks ePublisher Pro for Word features support for every major Help
format plus PDF, HTML and more. Flexible, precise, and efficient content delivery. Try it today!.
Doc-To-Help includes a one-click RoboHelp project converter. It's that easy. Watch the demo at

You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- infoinfocus -dot- com -dot-
To unsubscribe send a blank email to techwr-l-unsubscribe -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
or visit

To subscribe, send a blank email to techwr-l-join -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com

Send administrative questions to lisa -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit for more resources and info.

RE: Tech writing saves journalism: From: Fetzner, Bill

Previous by Author: Re: Tech writing saves journalism
Next by Author: Re: Did I overreact?
Previous by Thread: RE: Tech writing saves journalism
Next by Thread: RE: Tech writing saves journalism

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads