Re: cluetrain

Subject: Re: cluetrain
From: Sean Wheller <sean -at- inwords -dot- co -dot- za>
To: techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
Date: Mon, 12 Jun 2006 07:36:10 +0200

On Monday 12 June 2006 03:57, Stuart Burnfield wrote:
> Sean said:
> > I wonder many writers out there work in companies that embrace
> > the thinking outlined in "the cluetrain manifesto"?
> >
> > []
> As a technical writer, don't you just itch to rewite these long-winded,
> repetitive, 95 theses? I can't help thinking there are maybe 15 plain,
> concrete, unambiguous theses struggling to get out.

Perhaps. Why no give it a try.

> I don't know how a company could "embrace the thinking"--it would be like
> embracing a hot-air ballon.
> Did you get any takers, Sean?

No takers. But it was also interesting to see that all serious comment was
off-list. I wonder what that says.

Ask me about the Monkey.

Sean Wheller
Technical Author
sean -at- inwords -dot- co -dot- za

WebWorks ePublisher Pro for Word features support for every major Help
format plus PDF, HTML and more. Flexible, precise, and efficient content
delivery. Try it today!.

Doc-To-Help includes a one-click RoboHelp project converter. It's that easy. Watch the demo at

You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- infoinfocus -dot- com -dot-

To unsubscribe send a blank email to
techwr-l-unsubscribe -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
or visit

To subscribe, send a blank email to techwr-l-join -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com

Send administrative questions to lisa -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit for more resources and info.


Re: cluetrain: From: Stuart Burnfield

Previous by Author: Re: (no subject)
Next by Author: Re: cluetrain
Previous by Thread: Re: cluetrain
Next by Thread: Re: cluetrain

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads