Wikipedia quality

Subject: Wikipedia quality
From: John Cornellier <jcornellier -at- abingdon -dot- oilfield -dot- slb -dot- com>
Date: Thu, 13 Jul 2006 17:31:44 +0100

The vast majority of Wikipedia contributors do a proper job. Yes, there are rogue individuals but there are enough "watchers" and "editors" - in virtually every time zone - to counter their damage.

In one study, IBM measured the correction of vandalism on Wikipedia; the median time was 5 minutes.


nosnivel -at- netvision -dot- net -dot- il wrote:

I'd rather not trust an encyclopedia that would accept me as a contributor.


WebWorks ePublisher Pro for Word features support for every major Help
format plus PDF, HTML and more. Flexible, precise, and efficient content delivery. Try it today!.
Doc-To-Help includes a one-click RoboHelp project converter. It's that easy. Watch the demo at

You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- infoinfocus -dot- com -dot-
To unsubscribe send a blank email to techwr-l-unsubscribe -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
or visit

To subscribe, send a blank email to techwr-l-join -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com

Send administrative questions to lisa -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit for more resources and info.


(no subject): From: nosnivel -at- netvision -dot- net -dot- il

Previous by Author: Re: the Netherlands vs. The Netherlands
Next by Author: Re: pumpkin-styled pdf format
Previous by Thread: editing wiki pages
Next by Thread: Re: Wikipedia quality

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads