Re: Too old?

Subject: Re: Too old?
From: "Bryan Sherman" <bsherm -at- gmail -dot- com>
To: techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 10:43:34 -0400

I'm not sure I interpret that requirement the same way you do. I see it as a
minumum, not a range. You are trying to communicate what level the position
is... if I say 7-10 years I am looking for experience. If a candidate has 20
years, and it is relevant experience, all the better.

On 9/26/06, Richard Lewis <tech44writer -at- yahoo -dot- com> wrote:

Frankly, I have never seen such. It appears that most employers want 3
to 5 years experience; some want 7 to 10 years. To me it appears that most
employers think that TW's (or developers for that matter) don't get much
better beyond 5 to 10 years of experience. I guess they feel that beyond 10
years of experience we all kind of enter into a long-term dull funk.

Richard Lewis


WebWorks ePublisher Pro for Word features support for every major Help format plus PDF, HTML and more. Flexible, precise, and efficient content delivery. Try it today!

Easily create HTML or Microsoft Word content and convert to any popular Help file format or printed documentation. Learn more at

You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- infoinfocus -dot- com -dot-
To unsubscribe send a blank email to techwr-l-unsubscribe -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
or visit

To subscribe, send a blank email to techwr-l-join -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com

Send administrative questions to lisa -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit for more resources and info.

Re: Too old?: From: Bill Swallow
Re: Too old?: From: Richard Lewis

Previous by Author: Siebel iHelp
Next by Author: Re: behavioral specifications
Previous by Thread: Re: Too old?
Next by Thread: Re: Too old?

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads