TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
>Pro TechWriter wrote:
>In my 20+ year career, I have only been tested twice. I don't usually test
>technical writers when I have hired them (I've been a manager several
>times), but instead talk about:
I hope this information helps anyone considering becoming a tech writer or
are interviewing for a tech writer position. PTWriter's approach is not
only an excellent way to assess a tech writer's strengths and weaknesses,
it's also precisely what I was asked recently.
>What is [your] approach to writing, and what are [your] methods?
The answer that has impressed most interviewers is when I tell them that I
typically produce a document that contains a great deal of information up
front. This process allows reviewers to do just that: review (instead of
filling in large chunks of information).
>I look at their samples, and then I show something that we've done and ask
>what they think? What do they like, what would they do differently?
This separates the tech writers from the experts. A good tech writer can
follow directions and produce what's asked for. A great tech writer will be
able to identify gaps and make recommendations.
>What are their grammar pet peeves?
Run-on sentences, but that's just me.
>How do they feel about working from standards, and have they participated
>in writing any?
This is a very important question. If you ever interview with a company
that says that they have never utilized a tech writer, hiring someone who
creates and/or follows standards/best practices instills confidence.
>Do they have a favorite reference, or several favorite references?
Saying the Microsoft Manual of Style usually produces a satisfied smile.
>What do they use for a "final say" if they need to make a decision about
>style? What about negotiating with other writers on style matters?
If you answer this question correctly, you could be a manager:^) When I
have shown that an agreed upon set of verbiage standards made documentation
projects go more smoothly, the grins were generated.
>Can they edit other's work? Can they self edit? Take suggestions from
>another editing their work?
And be prepared to state how you felt when someone went a little crazy with
a red pen. Seriously.
>How do they handle getting information from subject matter experts,
>especially the balky ones?
This question will always come up. My best answer (and I'm open to new
ideas) is to say that I would be willing to work around a SME's schedule to
get the information needed.
>Have they ever worked on a joint writing project where all the writing had
>to look like it came from one person? How did they handle that?
This question came up for the first time last week. I told the interviewer
that I took charge of making sure that all of the documentation followed the
same standards and had the same 'flavor'.
WebWorks ePublisher Pro for Word features support for every major Help
format plus PDF, HTML and more. Flexible, precise, and efficient content
delivery. Try it today! http://www.webworks.com/techwr-l
Create HTML or Microsoft Word content and convert to Help file formats or
printed documentation. Features include single source authoring, team authoring,
Web-based technology, and PDF output. http://www.DocToHelp.com/TechwrlList
You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- infoinfocus -dot- com -dot-