Re: Should we go to Structured FrameMaker

Subject: Re: Should we go to Structured FrameMaker
From: John Posada <jposada01 -at- yahoo -dot- com>
To: "Shenton, David \(DTRN\)" <david -dot- shenton -at- smithsdetection -dot- com>, TECHWR-L <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com>
Date: Fri, 22 Dec 2006 06:38:47 -0800 (PST)

> > Is it beneficial for a small pubs department?

What problem are you looking to solve? To do so because it's there,
no, not beneficial. The benefit is the elimination of a problem or a
specific improvement that you've previously identified. Have you
identified a feature of structured that would be an improvement to
your department?

John Posada
Senior Technical Writer

"I think the problem, to be quite honest with you, is that you've never actually known what the question is."

WebWorks ePublisher Pro for Word features support for every major Help
format plus PDF, HTML and more. Flexible, precise, and efficient content
delivery. Try it today!

Create HTML or Microsoft Word content and convert to Help file formats or
printed documentation. Features include single source authoring, team authoring,
Web-based technology, and PDF output.

You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- infoinfocus -dot- com -dot-

To unsubscribe send a blank email to
techwr-l-unsubscribe -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
or visit

To subscribe, send a blank email to techwr-l-join -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com

Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit for more resources and info.

Should we go to Structured FrameMaker: From: Shenton, David (DTRN)

Previous by Author: Re: Batch Conversion of Images
Next by Author: Re: electronic submission
Previous by Thread: Re: Should we go to Structured FrameMaker
Next by Thread: Re: Should we go to Structured FrameMaker

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads