TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:Re: Lyx or Writer From:"David Neeley" <dbneeley -at- gmail -dot- com> To:techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com Date:Sat, 24 Mar 2007 10:53:51 -0500
"An earlier message mentioned lyx, which prompted me to have a look at
it. What I'm curious to know, why use lyx when writer now exists (and
the latter makes extensive use of xml technologies?
I've done a quick web search for comparisons but couldn't find anything."
I presume you mean OpenOffice.org writer?
If so, they are two very different products. Writer is a direct
competitor to Microsoft Word and other word processors. Lyx works
differently--it is called a "document processor" or a WYGIWYM (what
you get is what you *mean*) product.
That means, among other things, that the Lyx interface does not look
the same as the final output, for one thing. However, writing and
applying styles is simple--but "freelancing" or modifying styles is
very difficult. The writer is largely constrained to the style
selection given by a particular stylesheet. The "fiddly bits" (as some
of our British friends would put it) are handled by Lyx below the
radar of conscious thought.
Autonumbering, for example, is simple and flawless. Footnotes, too,
are extremely simple. The application does not get in the way of
While it is simple to see how the output would look in any format
desired, while writing that is not necessary nor often particularly
This may all seem very constraining--but I find the nearly complete
focus on content creation is quite liberating--I needn't be concerned
with presentation while writing. Modifying earlier versions of a
document, too, becomes much simpler (hooray! no format overrides!).
The real "fly in the ointment" is the relative complexity of creating
new style sheets. That is something I have not yet broached, although
it is on my agenda.
As I have said, creating a similar tool that works with a given XML
DTD would be very nice--especially if there is a tool that makes
conversion from XML to LaTeX straightforward for output. There may
already exist the latter, by the way, as I have not yet looked.
Create HTML or Microsoft Word content and convert to Help file formats or
printed documentation. Features include single source authoring, team authoring,
Web-based technology, and PDF output. http://www.DocToHelp.com/TechwrlList
Now shipping: Help & Manual 4 with RoboHelp(r) import! New editor,
full Unicode support. Create help files, web-based help and PDF in up
to 106 languages with Help & Manual: http://www.helpandmanual.com
You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-