RE: no QA

Subject: RE: no QA
From: "Dan Goldstein" <DGoldstein -at- riverainmedical -dot- com>
To: <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com>
Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 10:03:13 -0400

The best QA is an efficient and appropriate system that leads to good
design in the first place. When you have really good QA, the kind of
testing that you describe discovers very few conflicts -- and shows
where QA can be improved, so there will be even fewer conflicts next

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Chris Borokowski
> Sent: Tuesday, April 10, 2007 9:25 AM
> To: techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
> Subject: RE: no QA
> ... The best QA ever is using software for a real-life
> project and watching the conflicts that arise...

This message contains confidential information intended only for the use of the addressee(s). If you are not the addressee, or the person responsible for delivering it to the addressee, you are hereby notified that reading, disseminating, distributing, copying, electronic storing or the taking of any action in reliance on the contents of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message by mistake, please notify us, by replying to the sender, and delete the original message immediately thereafter. Thank you.


Create HTML or Microsoft Word content and convert to Help file formats or
printed documentation. Features include support for Windows Vista & 2007
Microsoft Office, team authoring, plus more.

Now shipping: Help &amp; Manual 4 with RoboHelp(r) import! New editor,
full Unicode support. Create help files, web-based help and PDF in up
to 106 languages with Help &amp; Manual:

You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-

To unsubscribe send a blank email to
techwr-l-unsubscribe -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
or visit

To subscribe, send a blank email to techwr-l-join -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com

Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit for more resources and info.

RE: no QA: From: Joanne Wittenbrook
RE: no QA: From: Chris Borokowski

Previous by Author: RE: Happy to be a Tech Writer?
Next by Author: RE: no QA
Previous by Thread: RE: no QA
Next by Thread: RE: no QA

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads