RE: People don't see problems that don't happen

Subject: RE: People don't see problems that don't happen
From: "Barbara Philbrick" <caslon -at- alltel -dot- net>
To: <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com>
Date: Mon, 7 May 2007 15:11:32 -0400

I would go with six-hour days for estimating, depending on your
environment. There are a lot of things that go on that don't directly
contribute to the project (training, status meetings, department meetings).
Plus people need to go to the bathroom and have a coffee or snack once in a
while.

I worked with a firm once that also changed estimates based on seniority
level --- assuming senior level people would have more demands on their
time, such as answering questions from junior folks and coping with
unexpected updates to earlier products. So a senior level person was
expected to be able to put 4 to 5 hours a day toward a project, while junior
level people would be able to put 6 to 7. If only that company had paid
attention to their own estimates....

Barb

-----Original Message-----
From: techwr-l-bounces+caslon=alltel -dot- net -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
[mailto:techwr-l-bounces+caslon=alltel -dot- net -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com] On Behalf Of
Gene Kim-Eng
Sent: Monday, May 07, 2007 2:23 PM
To: techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
Subject: Re: People don't see problems that don't happen

I always base project scheules on eight-hour days even if I expect that they
will take more, so that the project schedule shows resource "overcommits"
already taking place at the start of the projects, before things start going
wrong. And I try to set estimates based on past similar projects, as
nothing ever seems to go "ideally." In fact, my concept of "ideal" is when
things actually happen the way I predict they will. :)

Gene KIm-Eng



----- Original Message -----
From: "Chris Borokowski" <athloi -at- yahoo -dot- com>

> Another version of this is to do project estimates, even if
> informally, based on eight hour days, and use that to show that the
> work won't happen without another person.
>
> In my experience, it often makes sense to take the amount of time the
> task would ideally take and multiply it by four. Reality is a lot
> slower than we would like it to be (except on weekends).

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Create HTML or Microsoft Word content and convert to Help file formats or
printed documentation. Features include support for Windows Vista & 2007
Microsoft Office, team authoring, plus more.
http://www.DocToHelp.com/TechwrlList

Now shipping: Help &amp; Manual 4 with RoboHelp(r) import! New editor,
full Unicode support. Create help files, web-based help and PDF in up
to 106 languages with Help &amp; Manual: http://www.helpandmanual.com

---
You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-

To unsubscribe send a blank email to
techwr-l-unsubscribe -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
or visit http://lists.techwr-l.com/mailman/options/techwr-l/archive%40web.techwr-l.com


To subscribe, send a blank email to techwr-l-join -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com

Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.techwr-l.com/ for more resources and info.


Follow-Ups:

References:
Re: People don't see problems that don't happen: From: Chris Borokowski

Previous by Author: RE: Insurance Question
Next by Author: RE: Question about phraseology in Docs for Cellular
Previous by Thread: Re: People don't see problems that don't happen
Next by Thread: Re: People don't see problems that don't happen


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads