TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:"Disable the User"? From:Geoff Hart <ghart -at- videotron -dot- ca> To:TECHWR-L <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com>, Jim Morgan <Jim -dot- Morgan -at- jdsu -dot- com> Date:Thu, 28 Jun 2007 13:43:33 -0400
Jim Morgan wonders: <<An application I am documenting offers a
feature by which an administrator can suspend a user's privileges,
and this must be done before the user account can be removed from the
system. The button for this feature says "Disable." This leads to the
following confirmation prompt: "Are you sure you want to Disable the
Yeah, that's a bad choice of wording. Without going all politically
correct on you, it's important to note that (a) many disabled users
will be offended and (b) you are not in fact disabling a user, but
rather eliminating certain privileges. So it's both offensive and
The question is what you're actually doing here: Does this prevent
the user from logging in? In that case, some variant of "disable
logins" or (if you want to avoid the D word) "block logins" or
"temporarily suspend access to the system". Does it allow them to log
in but with reduced privileges? In that case, the better choice is
some variant of "change permissions [or access rights]".
<<If I follow my standard format for section headings, I also have to
have a heading that says "Disable a User." And at some point, again
if following my standard style, I would enter a warning that said,
"You can only delete a disabled user.">>
Personally, I immediately flash on Dilbert when I see that heading:
"On the plus side, the new and improved product no longer kills its
users -- it just disables them." Not a good choice. Again, use
wording that focuses on what you're actually doing: blocking logins
or changing access rights or permissions.
Use the right word for the job!
-- Geoff Hart
ghart -at- videotron -dot- ca / geoffhart -at- mac -dot- com
***Now available*** _Effective onscreen editing_
Create HTML or Microsoft Word content and convert to Help file formats or
printed documentation. Features include support for Windows Vista & 2007
Microsoft Office, team authoring, plus more. http://www.DocToHelp.com/TechwrlList
True single source, conditional content, PDF export, modular help.
Help & Manual is the most powerful authoring tool for technical
documentation. Boost your productivity! http://www.helpandmanual.com
You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-