Re: "Tech writers" are not "tech writers"

Subject: Re: "Tech writers" are not "tech writers"
From: Chris Borokowski <athloi -at- yahoo -dot- com>
To: techwr-l <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com>
Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2007 10:11:30 -0700 (PDT)

I admit, the phrase "technical communicator" has some appeal. Either
that or we go with a Web 2.0-style title like "Explainer" or
"Techno-Symbolic Synthesis Translator."

For the short term, tech coms? Techoms? Tekoms? Tech cons?

--- Jay Maechtlen <techwriter -at- covad -dot- net> wrote:

> Maybe this is another god reason to call ourselves "Technical
> Communicators"?
> But- even if we do, what's the short term to replace "Tech writer"?
technical writing | consulting | development

Bored stiff? Loosen up...
Download and play hundreds of games for free on Yahoo! Games.

Create HTML or Microsoft Word content and convert to Help file formats or
printed documentation. Features include support for Windows Vista & 2007
Microsoft Office, team authoring, plus more.

True single source, conditional content, PDF export, modular help.
Help & Manual is the most powerful authoring tool for technical
documentation. Boost your productivity!

You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-

To unsubscribe send a blank email to
techwr-l-unsubscribe -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
or visit

To subscribe, send a blank email to techwr-l-join -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com

Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit for more resources and info.


Re: "Tech writers" are not "tech writers": From: Jay Maechtlen

Previous by Author: "Tech writers" are not "tech writers"
Next by Author: Re: "Tech writers" are not "tech writers"
Previous by Thread: Re: "Tech writers" are not "tech writers"
Next by Thread: Re: "Tech writers" are not "tech writers"

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads