Re: "Tech writers" are not "tech writers"

Subject: Re: "Tech writers" are not "tech writers"
From: arroxaneullman -at- aol -dot- com
To: techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
Date: Mon, 16 Jul 2007 13:26:42 -0400


Hrm... I kinda' like Tekoms. Just out of curiosity, I googled it and got this:

http://www.121.nu/onetoone/visa_ftg2.aspx?ForetagID=620109

Translation, anyone?

:)
Arroxane







-----Original Message-----
From: Chris Borokowski <athloi -at- yahoo -dot- com>
To: techwr-l <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com>
Sent: Mon, 16 Jul 2007 12:11 pm
Subject: Re: "Tech writers" are not "tech writers"










I admit, the phrase "technical communicator" has some appeal. Either
that or we go with a Web 2.0-style title like "Explainer" or
"Techno-Symbolic Synthesis Translator."

For the short term, tech coms? Techoms? Tekoms? Tech cons?







________________________________________________________________________
AOL now offers free email to everyone. Find out more about what's free from AOL at AOL.com.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Create HTML or Microsoft Word content and convert to Help file formats or
printed documentation. Features include support for Windows Vista & 2007
Microsoft Office, team authoring, plus more.
http://www.DocToHelp.com/TechwrlList

True single source, conditional content, PDF export, modular help.
Help & Manual is the most powerful authoring tool for technical
documentation. Boost your productivity! http://www.helpandmanual.com

---
You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-

To unsubscribe send a blank email to
techwr-l-unsubscribe -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
or visit http://lists.techwr-l.com/mailman/options/techwr-l/archive%40web.techwr-l.com


To subscribe, send a blank email to techwr-l-join -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com

Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.techwr-l.com/ for more resources and info.


Follow-Ups:

References:
Re: "Tech writers" are not "tech writers": From: Chris Borokowski

Previous by Author: Article: Houston, We Have a Shuttle Typo
Next by Author: Re: Newsweek Article: "The Sad Fate of the Comma"
Previous by Thread: Re: "Tech writers" are not "tech writers"
Next by Thread: Re: "Tech writers" are not "tech writers"


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads