RE: permalancers

Subject: RE: permalancers
From: Technical Writer <tekwrytr -at- hotmail -dot- com>
To: Ned Bedinger <doc -at- edwordsmith -dot- com>
Date: Wed, 30 Jan 2008 08:36:20 -0500

Ned Bedinger wrote:
<quote>> Tek, you shouldnt take it so hard.> > You took my prose as obfuscated, pompous. I wrote it in that stilted > academic style to color it that color, because formal rhetoric is an > academic discipline--you can take rhetoric out of the school, but you > can't take the school out of rhetoric.</quote>

You seem to be making leaps unrelated to content, an odd tendency in a field dedicated to meticulous attention to detail. Specifically, I said your comments "could be classified as ... ," which is a long way from either "classifying as," or "taking as."

Formal rhetoric is the equivalent of the line in Michael Korda's old book, "Power," in which he recommended discreetly crossing one's legs during an interview to intimidate the interviewer with a view of one's Gucci loafers. It only works with those impressed with Gucci loafers.

That is, the nuances of language are largely lost on all but others who use words in their craft; the rest of the world doesn't care. A bitter pill, I know, but a reality of life in the 21st century, in which many are more fascinated by the view of Lara Croft climbing a wall than by Sophistry or rhetorical devices (unless you consider Lara Croft as a rhetorical device).

All that said, I like rhetoric. It would be nice if it were worth more in the technical writing field, but its value seems more appropriate in prose, poetry, or (in an obscure way) marketing. It is unfortunate that contemporary rhetoric is often based on introspection; the strategies are those which the creators believe would persuade them, when they should be based on what would persuade others.

Perhaps that is why rhetoricians do so poorly outside of academia; they fall in love with their own creations, and fail to realize they are blinded to the shortcomings of their creations by that love.
Need to know the score, the latest news, or you need your Hotmail®-get your "fix".

Create HTML or Microsoft Word content and convert to Help file formats or
printed documentation. Features include support for Windows Vista & 2007
Microsoft Office, team authoring, plus more.

True single source, conditional content, PDF export, modular help.
Help & Manual is the most powerful authoring tool for technical
documentation. Boost your productivity!

You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-

To unsubscribe send a blank email to
techwr-l-unsubscribe -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
or visit

To subscribe, send a blank email to techwr-l-join -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com

Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit for more resources and info.

RE: permalancers: From: Technical Writer
Re: permalancers: From: Ned Bedinger

Previous by Author: RE: permalancers
Next by Author: RE: permalancers
Previous by Thread: Re: permalancers
Next by Thread: RE: permalancers

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads