Re: Repeat the verb?

Subject: Re: Repeat the verb?
From: "Kathleen MacDowell" <kathleen -at- writefortheuser -dot- com>
To: "technical writing plus" <doc-x -at- earthlink -dot- net>
Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2008 11:07:13 -0500

I'd leave "..., and should" and add "it" "...." and it should combine..."

Reasoning: there's a shift in verbs, "the bank should have" to "and
(the bank should") combine."

I'm not very good at explaining things grammatically, but when the
language is dense and there's a shift in content/verbs/etc., I usually
try to repeat if I can't do a rewrite. It just makes it easier to
understand.

Regards,

Kathleen

On Tue, Apr 22, 2008 at 11:25 AM, technical writing plus
<doc-x -at- earthlink -dot- net> wrote:
> Here is my opinion. Do away with the comma in the middle (, and should..).
> As to the repeated 'should': I do not think that it is 'bad English'. In
> fact, sometimes it ought to be repeated.
>
> Here I'd say that your 'should' ought to be repeated. This repetition makes
> the sentence clearer.
>
> Jim Jones
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> ..Please note: a bulleted list is not permissible in this document. It's not
> the style. And, because the document is describing complex regulatory
> requirements and relationships, sentences tend to be dense and full. I
> rewrite the worst, and I consider this sentence to be borderline, but I'm
> going to leave it as is. There's too much else to do on the doc in the time
> I have.
>
> Having provided that context, I ask you this: if you had to incorporate the
> following sentence as is (and not break it into two sentences, or a bulleted
> list, or anything else that a reasonably talented tech writer would
> immediately do), which version would you use? And, please tell me if you
> would add or remove any punctuation:
>
> ---The bank should have clear standards for the collection and modification
> of all elements, and should combine these elements in a manner that most
> effectively enables it to quantify its exposure to operational risk.
>
> ---The bank should have clear standards for the collection and modification
> of all elements, and combine these elements in a manner that most
> effectively enables it to quantify its exposure to operational risk.
>
> I always want to repeat the modal auxiliary; it seems too hard to wade
> through the first long noun phrase and instantly remember that auxiliary
> when you hit the second base verb form. However, I have been informed that
> this type of repetition is "bad English."..
>




--
Kathleen MacDowell
www.writefortheuser.com
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Create HTML or Microsoft Word content and convert to Help file formats or
printed documentation. Features include support for Windows Vista & 2007
Microsoft Office, team authoring, plus more.
http://www.DocToHelp.com/TechwrlList

True single source, conditional content, PDF export, modular help.
Help & Manual is the most powerful authoring tool for technical
documentation. Boost your productivity! http://www.helpandmanual.com

---
You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-

To unsubscribe send a blank email to
techwr-l-unsubscribe -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
or visit http://lists.techwr-l.com/mailman/options/techwr-l/archive%40web.techwr-l.com


To subscribe, send a blank email to techwr-l-join -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com

Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.techwr-l.com/ for more resources and info.


Follow-Ups:

References:
Repeat the verb?: From: Nancy Allison
RE: Repeat the verb?: From: technical writing plus

Previous by Author: Re: there is vs. there's
Next by Author: Re: Repeat the verb?
Previous by Thread: Re: Repeat the verb?
Next by Thread: RE: Repeat the verb?


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:


Sponsored Ads