Debunking the grammar myths

Subject: Debunking the grammar myths
From: Odile Sullivan-Tarazi <odile -at- mindspring -dot- com>
To: techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2008 11:22:19 -0700

Here's one. No doubt there are others.

_The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language_, Huddleston and Pullum

Reviewed here:

ComponentOne Doc-To-Help gives you everything you need to author and
publish quality Help, Web, and print content. Perfect for technical
authors, developers, and policy writers. Download a FREE trial.

True single source, conditional content, PDF export, modular help.
Help & Manual is the most powerful authoring tool for technical
documentation. Boost your productivity!

You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-

To unsubscribe send a blank email to
techwr-l-unsubscribe -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
or visit

To subscribe, send a blank email to techwr-l-join -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com

Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit for more resources and info.

Previous by Author: Re: "Up with which I will not put" (was: RE: "and then," or simply "then"?)
Next by Author: Re: online help standards
Previous by Thread: Re: SnagIt Question
Next by Thread: known-new contract and business writing

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads