TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
RE: Example of clear tech-comms and policy guidance writing this good
Subject:RE: Example of clear tech-comms and policy guidance writing this good From:"McLauchlan, Kevin" <Kevin -dot- McLauchlan -at- safenet-inc -dot- com> To:"Dan Goldstein" <DGoldstein -at- riverainmedical -dot- com>, <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com> Date:Wed, 18 Mar 2009 09:55:11 -0400
> -----Original Message-----
> From:
> techwr-l-bounces+kevin -dot- mclauchlan=safenet-inc -dot- com -at- lists -dot- techwr
-l.com [mailto:techwr-l-bounces+kevin.mclauchlan=safenet->
inc -dot- com -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com] On Behalf Of Dan Goldstein
> Sent: Wednesday, March 18, 2009 8:34 AM
> To: techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
> Subject: RE: Example of clear tech-comms and policy guidance
> writing this good
>
> Well laid out, but poorly written.
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Daniel Ng
> > Sent: Wednesday, March 18, 2009 5:42 AM
> > To: techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
> > Subject: Example of clear tech-comms and policy guidance
> > writing this good
> >
> > Example of clear technical writing to
> > support policy making, and education.
> > Nice...
Up to and including page 8, I've found some instances where the writer
should have paid attention to sentence-structure parallelism among
bullet-list points. In fact, some were full sentences while others were
fragments. But they were obviously bullet points, and they conveyed
their information briskly and without inducing any stumbling on my part.
Other than that breakdown of parallelism (oh, the horror) I found what
Daniel found - good, clear, engaging writing, where somebody obviously
put a lot of thought into both the content and the
organization/presentation of that content.
So, what aspects of the writing offended you? Do I need to read further
to find them, or did I overlook them already?
- Kevin
The information contained in this electronic mail transmission
may be privileged and confidential, and therefore, protected
from disclosure. If you have received this communication in
error, please notify us immediately by replying to this
message and deleting it from your computer without copying
or disclosing it.
ComponentOne Doc-To-Help 2009 is your all-in-one authoring and publishing
solution. Author in Doc-To-Help's XML-based editor, Microsoft Word or
HTML and publish to the Web, Help systems or printed manuals. http://www.doctohelp.com
Help & Manual 5: The complete help authoring tool for individual
authors and teams. Professional power, intuitive interface. Write
once, publish to 8 formats. Multi-user authoring and version control! http://www.helpandmanual.com/
---
You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-