RE: that vs who

Subject: RE: that vs who
From: "Combs, Richard" <richard -dot- combs -at- Polycom -dot- com>
To: "Peter Neilson" <neilson -at- windstream -dot- net>, "techwr-l" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com>
Date: Thu, 2 Apr 2009 12:27:34 -0600

Peter Neilson wrote:

> "Any user >who< desires good results follows the instructions
carefully."
>
> "Any user >that< desires good results follows the instructions
carefully."

>From a Random House Dictionary usage note (at dictionary.com):

"Some grammarians have argued that only who and not that should be used
to introduce a restrictive relative clause that identifies a person.
This restriction has no basis either in logic or in the usage of the
best writers; it is entirely acceptable to write either the woman that
wanted to talk to you or the woman who wanted to talk to you."

I prefer "who" except when multiple instances of it make a sentence
harder to parse. Sometimes changing the pronoun clarifies the
relationships.

But in any situation remotely like the example, I'd solve the problem by
changing the sentence from third person to second:

"For good results, follow the instructions carefully."

Richard


Richard G. Combs
Senior Technical Writer
Polycom, Inc.
richardDOTcombs AT polycomDOTcom
303-223-5111
------
rgcombs AT gmailDOTcom
303-777-0436
------






^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

ComponentOne Doc-To-Help 2009 is your all-in-one authoring and publishing
solution. Author in Doc-To-Help's XML-based editor, Microsoft Word or
HTML and publish to the Web, Help systems or printed manuals.
http://www.doctohelp.com

Help & Manual 5: The complete help authoring tool for individual
authors and teams. Professional power, intuitive interface. Write
once, publish to 8 formats. Multi-user authoring and version control! http://www.helpandmanual.com/

---
You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-

To unsubscribe send a blank email to
techwr-l-unsubscribe -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
or visit http://lists.techwr-l.com/mailman/options/techwr-l/archive%40web.techwr-l.com


To subscribe, send a blank email to techwr-l-join -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com

Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.techwr-l.com/ for more resources and info.

Please move off-topic discussions to the Chat list, at:
http://lists.techwr-l.com/mailman/listinfo/techwr-l-chat


References:
that vs who: From: Peter Neilson

Previous by Author: RE: TECHWR-L Digest, Vol 42, Issue 25
Next by Author: RE: Which is more acceptable
Previous by Thread: Re: that vs who
Next by Thread: re:that vs who


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads


Sponsored Ads