Re: Grammar (again!)

Subject: Re: Grammar (again!)
From: Deborah Hemstreet <dvora -at- tech-challenged -dot- com>
To: Mike Starr <mike -at- writestarr -dot- com>
Date: Wed, 20 May 2009 12:14:18 -0400

Hi Mike,

It is neither... they have been licensed out - that is WE own the
patent, we license the patent to other companies... the term we use for
that is license out...

"license out" is the terminology for that process. I've seen the term
"out-license" but that is a fairly new way of relating to it.


Mike Starr wrote:
> I'm not fond of either one... I can't tell whether you have paid another company to use their technology or you have six technologies that you license to clients.
> Assuming the first, I'd probably say something like "We have acquired licensing for six available technologies (in various stages of development)."
> Assuming the second, I'd probably say something like "We have six available technologies (in various stages of development) available for license."
> Mike

ComponentOne Doc-To-Help 2009 is your all-in-one authoring and publishing
solution. Author in Doc-To-Help's XML-based editor, Microsoft Word or
HTML and publish to the Web, Help systems or printed manuals.

Help & Manual 5: The complete help authoring tool for individual
authors and teams. Professional power, intuitive interface. Write
once, publish to 8 formats. Multi-user authoring and version control!

You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-

To unsubscribe send a blank email to
techwr-l-unsubscribe -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
or visit

To subscribe, send a blank email to techwr-l-join -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com

Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit for more resources and info.

Please move off-topic discussions to the Chat list, at:


GUI Elements defined: From: Bruce Megan (ST-CO/ENG2.2)
Re: GUI Elements defined: From: Gregory P Sweet
Re: GUI Elements defined: From: Chris Morton
Grammar (again!): From: Deborah Hemstreet
Re: Grammar (again!): From: Mike Starr

Previous by Author: Yet one more - really need an explanation for this one
Next by Author: Re: Grammar (again!)
Previous by Thread: Re: Grammar (again!)
Next by Thread: RE: Grammar (again!)

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads