RE: Documentation confidentiality level policy

Subject: RE: Documentation confidentiality level policy
From: "Technical Writing Plus" <doc-x -at- earthlink -dot- net>
To: <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com>
Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2009 12:44:03 -0600

My take on that is that it is a one-way kind of thing; in other words, the
customers would get the information from the company but the company has no
expectation wrt to them not re-distributing. This expectation is for the NDA

Jim Jones;

-----Original Message-----
From: techwr-l-bounces+doc-x=earthlink -dot- net -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
[mailto:techwr-l-bounces+doc-x=earthlink -dot- net -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com] On Behalf
Of Gene Kim-Eng
Sent: Wednesday, October 21, 2009 11:20 AM
To: techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
Subject: Re: Documentation confidentiality level policy

I'm wondering how a "customers only" category in which customers are not
an NDA in which they agree not to redistribute information to non-customers
could be maintained.

Gene Kim-Eng

----- Original Message -----
From: "Robert Lauriston" <robert -at- lauriston -dot- com>
> Your terminology seems really more about distribution than
> confidentiality. I'd be explicit rather than creative:
> public
> customers only
> under NDA only
> internal only


Free Software Documentation Project Web Cast: Covers developing Table of
Contents, Context IDs, and Index, as well as Doc-To-Help
2009 tips, tricks, and best practices.

Help & Manual 5: The complete help authoring tool for individual
authors and teams. Professional power, intuitive interface. Write
once, publish to 8 formats. Multi-user authoring and version control!

You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-

To unsubscribe send a blank email to
techwr-l-unsubscribe -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
or visit

To subscribe, send a blank email to techwr-l-join -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com

Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit for more resources and info.

Please move off-topic discussions to the Chat list, at:


Re: Documentation confidentiality level policy: From: Gene Kim-Eng

Previous by Author: RE: Is there such a thing as a 'Commonly accepted US and UK/CommonwealthTerms' list that is online and available to all? Should PDFsalways be PDF's for a US audience, if it is a book?
Next by Author: RE: Documentation confidentiality level policy
Previous by Thread: Re: Documentation confidentiality level policy
Next by Thread: RE: Documentation confidentiality level policy

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads