RE: A different "personality type" angle

Subject: RE: A different "personality type" angle
From: "McLauchlan, Kevin" <Kevin -dot- McLauchlan -at- safenet-inc -dot- com>
To: "evbarney -at- comcast -dot- net" <evbarney -at- comcast -dot- net>
Date: Fri, 5 Feb 2010 10:28:17 -0500

EVBARNEY asked :

> So how does all that relate to fandom and brands.

Simply that I feel that I'm sniffing around the edges of a gestalt and I can't quite
pin down whether it's real or "burnt toast".

Even if there IS a connection among fandom/brand-loyalty and preferred
approaches to apprehending existence (and instructional material), it
doesn't really matter unless some useful (and inexpensive) predictive
technique can be found.

- K

The information contained in this electronic mail transmission
may be privileged and confidential, and therefore, protected
from disclosure. If you have received this communication in
error, please notify us immediately by replying to this
message and deleting it from your computer without copying
or disclosing it.


Are you looking for one documentation tool that does it all? Author,
build, test, and publish your Help files with just one easy-to-use tool.
Try the latest Doc-To-Help 2009 v3 risk-free for 30-days at:

Explore CAREER options and paths related to Technical Writing,
learn to create SOFTWARE REQUIREMENTS documents, and
get tips on FUNCTIONAL SPECIFICATION best practices. Free at:

You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-

To unsubscribe send a blank email to
techwr-l-unsubscribe -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
or visit

To subscribe, send a blank email to techwr-l-join -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com

Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit for more resources and info.

Please move off-topic discussions to the Chat list, at:

RE: A different "personality type" angle: From: McLauchlan, Kevin
Re: A different "personality type" angle: From: evbarney

Previous by Author: RE: A different "personality type" angle
Next by Author: RE: Need a word for...
Previous by Thread: Re: A different "personality type" angle
Next by Thread: Anybody? Anybody? WAS Your typographic conventions and justification for

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads