Re: Semantic(s)

Subject: Re: Semantic(s)
From: Bill Swallow <techcommdood -at- gmail -dot- com>
To: Janet Swisher <jmswisher -at- gmail -dot- com>
Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2010 14:04:47 -0400

Irregardless, for all intensive purposes, it's a moot point. These
mistakes will always be coming down the pipe and will keep us chomping
at the bit to tow the line. ;-)

(Go ahead, count 'em!)

Yes, improper use drives me nutty. Not that I'm not there already.

On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 1:02 PM, Janet Swisher <jmswisher -at- gmail -dot- com> wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 10:06 AM, Nancy Allison <maker -at- verizon -dot- net> wrote:
>> What would you say the difference is? Semantic only?
> Not to pick on Nancy, but she triggered one of my usage hot buttons.
> Why is it that people use "semantic only" or "just semantics" when
> what they mean is "meaningless"?
> Semantics is the study of meaning. If a difference is "semantic only",
> then it should be a difference in meaning, that is, a difference that
> actually means something. If I wanted to know whether it was a
> meaningless difference, I would ask something "Just terminology?"
> Am I the only one with this pet peeve?

Bill Swallow

Twitter: @techcommdood

Available for contract and full time opportunities.

STC Ideas:

Use Doc-To-Help's XML-based editor, Microsoft Word, or HTML and
produce desktop, Web, or print deliverables. Just write (or import)
and Doc-To-Help does the rest. Free trial:

Explore CAREER options and paths related to Technical Writing,
learn to create SOFTWARE REQUIREMENTS documents, and
get tips on FUNCTIONAL SPECIFICATION best practices. Free at:

You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-

To unsubscribe send a blank email to
techwr-l-unsubscribe -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
or visit

To subscribe, send a blank email to techwr-l-join -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com

Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit for more resources and info.

Please move off-topic discussions to the Chat list, at:


Semantic(s): From: Janet Swisher

Previous by Author: Re: Senior vs. principal writer
Next by Author: Re: Senior vs. principal writer
Previous by Thread: RE: Semantic(s)
Next by Thread: Re: Semantic(s)

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads