Re: Semantic(s)

Subject: Re: Semantic(s)
From: Sally Derrick <sjd1201 -at- gmail -dot- com>
To: Bill Swallow <techcommdood -at- gmail -dot- com>
Date: Wed, 17 Mar 2010 16:39:39 -0500

Are you sure that isn't a 'mute' point?

Sally


On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 1:04 PM, Bill Swallow <techcommdood -at- gmail -dot- com>wrote:

> Irregardless, for all intensive purposes, it's a moot point. These
> mistakes will always be coming down the pipe and will keep us chomping
> at the bit to tow the line. ;-)
>
> (Go ahead, count 'em!)
>
> Yes, improper use drives me nutty. Not that I'm not there already.
>
> On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 1:02 PM, Janet Swisher <jmswisher -at- gmail -dot- com>
> wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 17, 2010 at 10:06 AM, Nancy Allison <maker -at- verizon -dot- net>
> wrote:
> >> What would you say the difference is? Semantic only?
> >
> > Not to pick on Nancy, but she triggered one of my usage hot buttons.
> >
> > Why is it that people use "semantic only" or "just semantics" when
> > what they mean is "meaningless"?
> >
> > Semantics is the study of meaning. If a difference is "semantic only",
> > then it should be a difference in meaning, that is, a difference that
> > actually means something. If I wanted to know whether it was a
> > meaningless difference, I would ask something "Just terminology?"
> >
> > Am I the only one with this pet peeve?
>
> --
> Bill Swallow
>
> Twitter: @techcommdood
> Blog: http://techcommdood.com
> LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/techcommdood
>
> Available for contract and full time opportunities.
>
> ------------------------------------------------
> STC Ideas: http://stcideas.ning.com
> Join: http://stcideas.ning.com/?xgi=6X1vNGI
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>
> Use Doc-To-Help's XML-based editor, Microsoft Word, or HTML and
> produce desktop, Web, or print deliverables. Just write (or import)
> and Doc-To-Help does the rest. Free trial: http://www.doctohelp.com
>
> Explore CAREER options and paths related to Technical Writing,
> learn to create SOFTWARE REQUIREMENTS documents, and
> get tips on FUNCTIONAL SPECIFICATION best practices. Free at:
> http://www.ModernAnalyst.com
>
> ---
> You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as sjd1201 -at- gmail -dot- com -dot-
>
> To unsubscribe send a blank email to
> techwr-l-unsubscribe -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
> or visit
> http://lists.techwr-l.com/mailman/options/techwr-l/sjd1201%40gmail.com
>
>
> To subscribe, send a blank email to techwr-l-join -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
>
> Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit
> http://www.techwr-l.com/ for more resources and info.
>
> Please move off-topic discussions to the Chat list, at:
> http://lists.techwr-l.com/mailman/listinfo/techwr-l-chat
>
>
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Use Doc-To-Help's XML-based editor, Microsoft Word, or HTML and
produce desktop, Web, or print deliverables. Just write (or import)
and Doc-To-Help does the rest. Free trial: http://www.doctohelp.com

Explore CAREER options and paths related to Technical Writing,
learn to create SOFTWARE REQUIREMENTS documents, and
get tips on FUNCTIONAL SPECIFICATION best practices. Free at:
http://www.ModernAnalyst.com

---
You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-

To unsubscribe send a blank email to
techwr-l-unsubscribe -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
or visit http://lists.techwr-l.com/mailman/options/techwr-l/archive%40web.techwr-l.com


To subscribe, send a blank email to techwr-l-join -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com

Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.techwr-l.com/ for more resources and info.

Please move off-topic discussions to the Chat list, at:
http://lists.techwr-l.com/mailman/listinfo/techwr-l-chat


References:
Semantic(s): From: Janet Swisher
Re: Semantic(s): From: Bill Swallow

Previous by Author: Re: Senior vs. principal writer
Next by Author: Re: AW: How do hiring companies view TW resumes?
Previous by Thread: Re: Semantic(s)
Next by Thread: Re: Semantic(s)


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads


Sponsored Ads