Re: Semantic(s)

Subject: Re: Semantic(s)
From: Bill Swallow <techcommdood -at- gmail -dot- com>
To: "Chinell, David F (UTCFS)" <David -dot- Chinell -at- GE -dot- com>
Date: Thu, 18 Mar 2010 08:56:01 -0400

Mute... I guess my subconscious really doesn't like it. ;)

Bill Swallow
Sent from my iPhone.

On Mar 17, 2010, at 3:58 PM, "Chinell, David F (UTCFS)" <David -dot- Chinell -at- GE -dot- com
> wrote:

> Bill:
> Did you mean to say "mute point" or "moo point" perhaps?
> Bear

Use Doc-To-Help's XML-based editor, Microsoft Word, or HTML and
produce desktop, Web, or print deliverables. Just write (or import)
and Doc-To-Help does the rest. Free trial:

Explore CAREER options and paths related to Technical Writing,
learn to create SOFTWARE REQUIREMENTS documents, and
get tips on FUNCTIONAL SPECIFICATION best practices. Free at:

You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-

To unsubscribe send a blank email to
techwr-l-unsubscribe -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
or visit

To subscribe, send a blank email to techwr-l-join -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com

Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit for more resources and info.

Please move off-topic discussions to the Chat list, at:


Semantic(s): From: Janet Swisher
Re: Semantic(s): From: Bill Swallow
RE: Semantic(s): From: Chinell, David F (UTCFS)

Previous by Author: Re: Senior vs. principal writer
Next by Author: Re: Semantic(s)
Previous by Thread: RE: Semantic(s)
Next by Thread: RE: Semantic(s)

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads