Re: Re: Not an acronymn....

Subject: Re: Re: Not an acronymn....
From: Tony Chung <tonyc -at- tonychung -dot- ca>
To: techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
Date: Thu, 20 May 2010 12:11:16 -0700

On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 11:42 AM, Gene Kim-Eng <techwr -at- genek -dot- com> wrote:
> The traditional definitions of abbreviation and acronym should both exclude "K9," because there is neither a "K" nor a "9"
> in the word "canine," and because it isn't a real word it shouldn't be considered a hompohone, which is a word that has
> the same pronunciation as another word but a different meaning.

Why don't we all agree that it's a numerophonobreviation?


Gain access to everything you need to create and publish documentation,
manuals, and other information through multiple channels. Choose
authoring (and import) as well as virtually any output you may need.

- Use this space to communicate with TECHWR-L readers -
- Contact admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com for more information -

You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-

To unsubscribe send a blank email to
techwr-l-unsubscribe -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
or visit

To subscribe, send a blank email to techwr-l-join -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com

Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit for more resources and info.

Please move off-topic discussions to the Chat list, at:


RE: Re: Not an acronymn....: From: Gene Kim-Eng

Previous by Author: Re: Need App Recommendation
Next by Author: Re: Writing clearly
Previous by Thread: Re: Not an acronymn....
Next by Thread: RE: Not an acronymn....

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads