RE: Not an acronymn....

Subject: RE: Not an acronymn....
From: Fred Ridder <docudoc -at- hotmail -dot- com>
To: <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com>
Date: Thu, 20 May 2010 15:34:58 -0400

Tony Chung wrote:

> Why don't we all agree that it's a numerophonobreviation?

Because it's *not*. Just because you say it is, doesn't make it so!!



The New Busy think 9 to 5 is a cute idea. Combine multiple calendars with Hotmail.

Gain access to everything you need to create and publish documentation,
manuals, and other information through multiple channels. Choose
authoring (and import) as well as virtually any output you may need.

- Use this space to communicate with TECHWR-L readers -
- Contact admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com for more information -

You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-

To unsubscribe send a blank email to
techwr-l-unsubscribe -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
or visit

To subscribe, send a blank email to techwr-l-join -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com

Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit for more resources and info.

Please move off-topic discussions to the Chat list, at:

RE: Re: Not an acronymn....: From: Gene Kim-Eng
Re: Re: Not an acronymn....: From: Tony Chung

Previous by Author: RE: Good font combination story
Next by Author: RE: Levels of Job Responsibility
Previous by Thread: Re: Re: Not an acronymn....
Next by Thread: Fwd: Not an acronymn....

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads