Re: Anthropomorphism is bad because...

Subject: Re: Anthropomorphism is bad because...
From: Janice Gelb <janice -dot- gelb -at- oracle -dot- com>
To: techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2010 08:42:41 +1000

On Jun 22, 2010 10:45PM, Chris Despopoulos wrote:
>
> Vernacular brings up some reasoning behind anthropomorphism
> or systems. It makes active voice easier. As far as I can
> tell, active voice (generally agreed to be good, right?)
> equires an actor. YOU do x, y, and z. THE SYSTEM displays
> the foo dialog box.

Just want to note that active voice is important
when the actor is important. If the actor is not
important, then passive voice is acceptable. In
your example, it doesn't really matter that the
system is what displays the dialog box. Writing in
all active voice when documenting computer software
would result in a lot of redundancy as you would
always be repeating that "the program" or "the
system" were doing everything, which can pretty
much be taken for granted.

>
> Janice would say, "Ok, but you don't need to grant
> a system human qualities." True, but it's easier,
> and ultimately less demanding on the reader.[snip]
> So you *can* say "The system enters a wait state
> until you provide the foo." Or you can say "The
> system waits for a foo." You *can* say, "The
> system assembles the structures necessary to manage
> a foo", or you can say "The system expects a foo."

I have no problem with a system "waiting." I have a
problem with implying that the system *knows* it's
waiting ("expects," "anticipates"), tapping its
foot impatiently, no doubt :->

-- Janice

**************************************************************
Janice Gelb | The only connection Oracle has with
janice -dot- gelb -at- oracle -dot- com | this message is the return address

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Gain access to everything you need to create and publish information
through multiple channels. Your choice of authoring (and import)
formats with virtually any output. Try Doc-To-Help free for 30-days.
http://www.doctohelp.com/


---
You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-

To unsubscribe send a blank email to
techwr-l-unsubscribe -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
or visit http://lists.techwr-l.com/mailman/options/techwr-l/archive%40web.techwr-l.com


To subscribe, send a blank email to techwr-l-join -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com

Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.techwr-l.com/ for more resources and info.

Please move off-topic discussions to the Chat list, at:
http://lists.techwr-l.com/mailman/listinfo/techwr-l-chat


Follow-Ups:

References:
RE: Anthropomorphism is bad because...: From: Chris Despopoulos

Previous by Author: Re: Anthropomorphism is bad because...
Next by Author: Re: Anthropomorphism is bad because...
Previous by Thread: Re: Anthropomorphism is bad because...
Next by Thread: Re: Anthropomorphism is bad because...


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads


Sponsored Ads