RE: Internet Jukebox

Subject: RE: Internet Jukebox
From: "McLauchlan, Kevin" <Kevin -dot- McLauchlan -at- safenet-inc -dot- com>
To: David Neeley <dbneeley -at- gmail -dot- com>
Date: Tue, 29 Jun 2010 10:41:52 -0400



> -----Original Message-----
> From: David Neeley [mailto:dbneeley -at- gmail -dot- com]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 29, 2010 10:04 AM
> To: McLauchlan, Kevin
> Cc: TECHWR-L
> Subject: Re: Internet Jukebox
>
> If you're listening to a 64 kb stream, that is 8 KB/second.
>
> Those who work at home and have an unlimited bandwidth broadband
> account will find this fairly trivial in most cases, but it's over 28
> MB per hour if you are on a capped plan.
>
> Of course, add up many of these in a corporate setting and the network
> can indeed become somewhat bogged down.
>


I'm in the backwoods hinterlands - otherwise known as the Canadian
office of a US company - so.... :-)

Network _has_ been sluggish the past week-and-a bit... which
kinda coincides with the number of World-Cup soccer matches
I see in the corner of people's screens around the office.

As for me, I don't watch sports, and I haven't bothered with
a radio (small market, no station that plays what I might
want to hear all day), but I'm going to steer clear of any
kind of streaming media. I'd rather not be seen as part of
the problem when they crack down.

Now, if we'd just get some cellular provider competition
here, and an affordable price for a wide-open data connection,
I could do the internet radio thing with no conflict.

Or.... satellite? Anybody have satellite radio going all
day? Costs? I too would look for something musical
(therefore, not rap...), non-annoying, and not demanding
for my background. Baroque sounds like a possibility,
or classical guitar, or instrumental jazz (except the the
really austere, bleeding-edge stuff). If it has lyrics,
it's either too annnoying or too engaging, neither of which
is a good fit for work.

- K

<usual> The information contained in this electronic mail transmission
may be privileged and confidential, and therefore, protected
from disclosure. If you have received this communication in
error, please notify us immediately by replying to this
message and deleting it from your computer without copying
or disclosing it.


^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Gain access to everything you need to create and publish information
through multiple channels. Your choice of authoring (and import)
formats with virtually any output. Try Doc-To-Help free for 30-days.
http://www.doctohelp.com/


---
You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-

To unsubscribe send a blank email to
techwr-l-unsubscribe -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
or visit http://lists.techwr-l.com/mailman/options/techwr-l/archive%40web.techwr-l.com


To subscribe, send a blank email to techwr-l-join -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com

Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.techwr-l.com/ for more resources and info.

Please move off-topic discussions to the Chat list, at:
http://lists.techwr-l.com/mailman/listinfo/techwr-l-chat


References:
OT: Internet Jukebox: From: David Neeley
RE: Internet Jukebox: From: McLauchlan, Kevin
Re: Internet Jukebox: From: David Neeley

Previous by Author: RE: Writing a product functional spec AFTER the product is built
Next by Author: RE: Writing a product functional spec AFTER the product is built
Previous by Thread: Re: Internet Jukebox
Next by Thread: Re: Internet Jukebox


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads


Sponsored Ads