RE: Scrum sucks!

Subject: RE: Scrum sucks!
From: Kat Kuvinka <katkuvinka -at- hotmail -dot- com>
To: <techcommdood -at- gmail -dot- com>, <info -at- spectrumwritingllc -dot- com>
Date: Wed, 15 Sep 2010 15:26:28 -0400

I feel that scrum has many built-in contradictions. You should be able to respond to change, yet you must commit to your goals. Process is undervalued, yet the process must be followed to do scrum right. I could go on. As I mentioned, we were committed to Scrum from the get-go. We have had training. We also do team-building. We have our personalities evaluated. We have open work areas...

I don't think I am alone in my frustration. What I suspect is, Scrum has some optimal team size level.

> My intent is not to disrespect but to shed light on the possibilities.
> It's absolutely possible to make things work, but the trick is that
> the changes have to be embraced. I fully realize there are
> organizations that - for whatever reason - do not embrace change well
> and do not deal with issues appropriately. That certainly doesn't mean
> that we should take our eyes off the prize.
> I asked you about the session because you posted about it, and assumed
> you were the speaker (plugging your session). Wrong assumption on my
> part.
> On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 11:59 AM, Spectrum Writing
> <info -at- spectrumwritingllc -dot- com> wrote:
> > Bill,
> >
> > I don't know, just the topic itself was listed. I do know that from personal
> > experience in not one, but two separate organizations, that as a lone
> > writer, Scrum was indeed difficult. Yes, it can work without "hummingbird
> > behavior," but the effort to make it work darn near overwhelmed the ultimate
> > objective of getting documentation done. I make the analogy to the physical
> > sciences - some things simply aren't scalable in either direction.
> >
> > I am glad that you seemed to have gotten Scrum to work for you as a Lone
> > Writer, but don't discount the experiences and emotions of those of us who
> > have suffered it. We weren't the only ones on the teams and w/out all of the
> > team members understanding their roles and w/ the organizations just
> > throwing scrum into place w/out any formal research or training in it (in
> > both of the organizations that I was because it was the latest buzzword and
> > the CTOs in both places loved over using the phrase "we need to be on the
> > bleeding edge"), it was a nightmare.
> >
> > Different people on these lists have different experiences with the same
> > things and we need to respect that w/out judging them or coming down on them
> > like we "know it all."
> --
> Bill Swallow
> Twitter: @techcommdood
> Blog:
> LinkedIn:


Create and publish documentation through multiple channels with Doc-To-Help.
Choose your authoring formats and get any output you may need. Try
Doc-To-Help, now with MS SharePoint integration, free for 30-days.

LavaCon 2010 in San Diego Sept 29 - Oct 2 is now open for registration.
Use referral code TECHWR-L for $50 off conference tuition!
See program at:

You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-

To unsubscribe send a blank email to
techwr-l-unsubscribe -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
or visit

To subscribe, send a blank email to techwr-l-join -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com

Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit for more resources and info.

Please move off-topic discussions to the Chat list, at:


Scrum sucks!: From: Kat Kuvinka
RE: Scrum sucks!: From: Robart, Kay
RE: Scrum sucks!: From: Kat Kuvinka
RE: Scrum sucks!: From: Spectrum Writing
Re: Scrum sucks!: From: Bill Swallow
RE: Scrum sucks!: From: Spectrum Writing
Re: Scrum sucks!: From: Bill Swallow

Previous by Author: RE: Scrum sucks!
Next by Author: RE: Scrum sucks!
Previous by Thread: Re: Scrum sucks!
Next by Thread: Re: Scrum sucks!

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads