Re: throughput

Subject: Re: throughput
From: Bill Swallow <techcommdood -at- gmail -dot- com>
To: Daniel Feiglin <daniel_f -at- radwin -dot- com>
Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2011 09:47:07 -0500

> That's correct, but hardly user friendly. T'put is absolutely ghastly - but semantically clear in my context.

You're right, which is why you never see 'Mbps' in any networking
product documentation or marketing material. ;-)

Bill Swallow

Twitter: @techcommdood

Create and publish documentation through multiple channels with Doc-To-Help.
Choose your authoring formats and get any output you may need. Try
Doc-To-Help, now with MS SharePoint integration, free for 30-days.

You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-

To unsubscribe send a blank email to
techwr-l-unsubscribe -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
or visit

To subscribe, send a blank email to techwr-l-join -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com

Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit for more resources and info.

Please move off-topic discussions to the Chat list, at:


Re: throughput: From: Bill Swallow
RE: throughput: From: Daniel Feiglin

Previous by Author: Re: throughput
Next by Author: Re: throughput
Previous by Thread: RE: throughput
Next by Thread: RE: throughput

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads