TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Exactly right, but in this case it seems the word "throughput" itself
is too long to fit in whatever space they're trying to put it in,
which is why I suggest using the actual throughput shorthand for
what's being measured (bps, Mbps, etc.). There is no accepted
shorthand for "throughput", and inventing something may just cause
confusion, no matter how semantically clear you think it might be.
Your industry has norms. You should be versed in them and conform to
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 9:19 AM, Roberta Hennessey
<rahennessey -at- gmail -dot- com> wrote:
> Depending on what you are writing, throughput is a technical term understood
> network engineers and measures speeds of data transmission. I used to write
> for the router industry,
> and it a common term in that industry. Again, depending on what you are
> writing, engineers/user
> might not understand an alternate word.
> See definition below:
> *Throughput is the rate at which a computer or network sends or receives
Create and publish documentation through multiple channels with Doc-To-Help.
Choose your authoring formats and get any output you may need. Try
Doc-To-Help, now with MS SharePoint integration, free for 30-days. http://www.doctohelp.com
You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-