Re: throughput

Subject: Re: throughput
From: Richard Mateosian <xrmxrm -at- gmail -dot- com>
To: Mike Starr <mike -at- writestarr -dot- com>
Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2011 10:00:44 -0800

Use its units. ...RM

>> Is there an accepted short form or abbreviation of the word "throughput"
>> in the context of data transmission? It is too long to fit into the text
>> area of a small status widget.

Richard Mateosian <xrm -at- pacbell -dot- net>
Berkeley, California

Create and publish documentation through multiple channels with Doc-To-Help.
Choose your authoring formats and get any output you may need. Try
Doc-To-Help, now with MS SharePoint integration, free for 30-days.

You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-

To unsubscribe send a blank email to
techwr-l-unsubscribe -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
or visit

To subscribe, send a blank email to techwr-l-join -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com

Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit for more resources and info.

Please move off-topic discussions to the Chat list, at:


[no subject]: From: Daniel Feiglin
Re: throughput: From: Mike Starr

Previous by Author: Re: Mac Documentation: Venting
Next by Author: Re: need advice - writing wiki Help for web app
Previous by Thread: Re: throughput
Next by Thread: Re: throughput

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads