Re: throughput

Subject: Re: throughput
From: Gene Kim-Eng <techwr -at- genek -dot- com>
To: techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2011 11:05:05 -0800

I've seen "TP" commonly used in medical data processing and optics,
but mostly in white papers and other publications and not on actual
instrument displays. I think the safest thing would be numbers and
units, although that might not be a good approach if you have multiple
transfer rates to display and need to distinguish between them.

Gene Kim-Eng

>>> Is there an accepted short form or abbreviation of the word "throughput"
>>> in the context of data transmission? It is too long to fit into the text
>>> area of a small status widget.

Create and publish documentation through multiple channels with Doc-To-Help.
Choose your authoring formats and get any output you may need. Try
Doc-To-Help, now with MS SharePoint integration, free for 30-days.

You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-

To unsubscribe send a blank email to
techwr-l-unsubscribe -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
or visit

To subscribe, send a blank email to techwr-l-join -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com

Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit for more resources and info.

Please move off-topic discussions to the Chat list, at:

[no subject]: From: Daniel Feiglin
Re: throughput: From: Mike Starr
Re: throughput: From: Richard Mateosian

Previous by Author: Re: the wrong type of work (was: TechCom skills competency grid or matrix)
Next by Author: Re: need advice - writing wiki Help for web app
Previous by Thread: Re: throughput
Next by Thread: RE:

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads