RE: Alternatives to "blacklist" and "whitelist"

Subject: RE: Alternatives to "blacklist" and "whitelist"
From: Chris Despopoulos <despopoulos_chriss -at- yahoo -dot- com>
To: techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
Date: Tue, 15 Feb 2011 23:49:01 -0800 (PST)

I don't see anything confusing about blacklist vs whitelist, but I can
understand the desire to use different terms. One suggestion was already
allow/deny or accept/reject. You could also try include/exclude -- actually not
a technically accurate as accept/reject, but maybe more intuitive??? Or maybe


Create and publish documentation through multiple channels with Doc-To-Help.
Choose your authoring formats and get any output you may need. Try
Doc-To-Help, now with MS SharePoint integration, free for 30-days.

You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-

To unsubscribe send a blank email to
techwr-l-unsubscribe -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
or visit

To subscribe, send a blank email to techwr-l-join -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com

Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit for more resources and info.

Please move off-topic discussions to the Chat list, at:

Previous by Author: Re: "Frame Light?" was: RE: Framemaker Viewer? Floating
Next by Author: Re: Does metadata matter any longer
Previous by Thread: RE: Alternatives to "blacklist" and "whitelist"
Next by Thread: Map IDs

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads