Re: Evaluation Process - HATs

Subject: Re: Evaluation Process - HATs
From: Rick Stone <rstone75 -at- kc -dot- rr -dot- com>
To: Robert Lauriston <robert -at- lauriston -dot- com>
Date: Fri, 22 Jul 2011 13:26:45 -0500

Hi all

RoboHelp 9 allows review collaboration via PDF and a shared review. In that case all reviewers need is a PDF reader and access to the PDF. They can all see one another's comments and the help author can suck it all back into RoboHelp to accept or reject the comments.

Cheers... Rick :)

On 7/22/2011 12:01 PM, Robert Lauriston wrote:

I haven't used RoboHelp in quite a while, but the two companies do
seem to make similar mistakes. E.g. they both have track-changes
markup, but neither will let you output that markup to a PDF or Word
document so you can pass it along to reviewers who don't have Flare or

Create and publish documentation through multiple channels with Doc-To-Help.
Choose your authoring formats and get any output you may need. Try
Doc-To-Help, now with MS SharePoint integration, free for 30-days.

You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-
To unsubscribe send a blank email to
techwr-l-unsubscribe -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
or visit

To subscribe, send a blank email to techwr-l-join -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com

Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit for more resources and info.

Please move off-topic discussions to the Chat list, at:


Evaluation Process - HATs: From: Matt Moore
Re: Evaluation Process - HATs: From: Bill Swallow
Re: Evaluation Process - HATs: From: Julie Stickler
Re: Evaluation Process - HATs: From: Robert Lauriston

Previous by Author: Re: Evaluation Process - HATs
Next by Author: Re: Modern vs Old-fashioned Help
Previous by Thread: Re: Evaluation Process - HATs
Next by Thread: Re: Evaluation Process - HATs

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads