RE: FDA (b)anality

Subject: RE: FDA (b)anality
From: Kelly Parr <kparr -at- Vertica -dot- com>
To: "techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com>
Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2012 17:20:26 +0000

I once worked in an FDA-regulated industry (medical devices). If the FDA provided wording for a caution or warning, I used it verbatim, no matter what I thought about their word choice.

I didn't want them showing up at my office with crime scene tape. (Only half joking.)

Create and publish documentation through multiple channels with Doc-To-Help.
Choose your authoring formats and get any output you may need. Try
Doc-To-Help, now with MS SharePoint integration, free for 30-days.

You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-

To unsubscribe send a blank email to
techwr-l-leave -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
or visit

To subscribe, send a blank email to techwr-l-join -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com

Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit for more resources and info.

Looking for articles on Technical Communications? Head over to our online magazine at

Looking for the archived Techwr-l email discussions? Search our public email archives @

FDA (b)anality: From: Chris Morton
RE: FDA (b)anality: From: Brian.Henderson

Previous by Author: RE: Best practices for instructional design
Next by Author: Re: Information mapping
Previous by Thread: RE: FDA (b)anality
Next by Thread: Re: FDA (b)anality

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads