Re: FDA (b)anality

Subject: Re: FDA (b)anality
From: mattgras -at- comcast -dot- net
To: salt morton <salt -dot- morton -at- gmail -dot- com>
Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2012 17:21:22 +0000 (UTC)



Seems a good time to find something else to wrangle over. Why invite a tussle? I'd leave the regulatory language as is.



matt



----- Original Message -----


From: "Chris Morton" <salt -dot- morton -at- gmail -dot- com>
To: techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
Sent: Monday, January 9, 2012 9:04:00 AM
Subject: FDA (b)anality

My company has a software solution that is subject to FDA
approval/scrutiny. That entity insists that we use the following cautionary
statement in our user manual:

CAUTION: Federal law restricts this device to the sale by, or on the order
of, a physician.


Because the software is not a device, I modified the statement to read:

CAUTION: Federal law restricts this product to the sale by, or on the order
of, a physician.


Now our regulatory affairs guy has a pickle up his _____ and is hassling me
over the change. I believe that no one can, or will, bother us about this
minor modification.

What are your thoughts about this?
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Create and publish documentation through multiple channels with Doc-To-Help.
Choose your authoring formats and get any output you may need. Try
Doc-To-Help, now with MS SharePoint integration, free for 30-days.
http://www.doctohelp.com

---
You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as mattgras -at- comcast -dot- net -dot-

To unsubscribe send a blank email to
techwr-l-leave -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
or visit http://lists.techwr-l.com/mailman/options/techwr-l/mattgras%40comcast.net


To subscribe, send a blank email to techwr-l-join -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com

Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.techwhirl.com/email-discussion-groups/ for more resources and info.

Looking for articles on Technical Communications? ÂHead over to our online magazine at http://techwhirl.com

Looking for the archived Techwr-l email discussions? ÂSearch our public email archives @ http://techwr-l.com/archives
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Create and publish documentation through multiple channels with Doc-To-Help.
Choose your authoring formats and get any output you may need. Try
Doc-To-Help, now with MS SharePoint integration, free for 30-days.
http://www.doctohelp.com

---
You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-

To unsubscribe send a blank email to
techwr-l-leave -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
or visit http://lists.techwr-l.com/mailman/options/techwr-l/archive%40web.techwr-l.com


To subscribe, send a blank email to techwr-l-join -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com

Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.techwhirl.com/email-discussion-groups/ for more resources and info.

Looking for articles on Technical Communications? Head over to our online magazine at http://techwhirl.com

Looking for the archived Techwr-l email discussions? Search our public email archives @ http://techwr-l.com/archives


References:
FDA (b)anality: From: Chris Morton

Previous by Author: Re: ANONYMOUS POST: Staffing with unskilled workers
Next by Author: RE: RoboHelp 9 and FrameMaker 9 vs. FrameMaker 10
Previous by Thread: Re: software is part of the device (Was "FDA (b)anality")
Next by Thread: RE: FDA (b)anality


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads


Sponsored Ads