RE: FDA (b)anality

Subject: RE: FDA (b)anality
From: "Dan Goldstein" <DGoldstein -at- riveraintech -dot- com>
To: <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com>
Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2012 15:36:22 -0500

Hate to spoil the drama, but you won't get a recall over a something
like that. At most, you might get a written "Notice of Inspectional
Observations," which indicates what they want you to correct. But I
think most auditors would just orally suggest that it be corrected and
leave it at that.

-----Original Message-----
From: Gene Kim-Eng
Sent: Monday, January 09, 2012 3:25 PM
To: Bill Swallow
Cc: techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
Subject: Re: FDA (b)anality

Government inspections and audits being what they are, it might be years
before anyone noticed, and then one morning their product recall would
be on CNN.

This message contains confidential information intended only for the use of the addressee(s). If you are not the addressee, or the person responsible for delivering it to the addressee, you are hereby notified that reading, disseminating, distributing, copying, electronic storing or the taking of any action in reliance on the contents of this message is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message by mistake, please notify us, by replying to the sender, and delete the original message immediately thereafter. Thank you.


Create and publish documentation through multiple channels with Doc-To-Help.
Choose your authoring formats and get any output you may need. Try
Doc-To-Help, now with MS SharePoint integration, free for 30-days.

You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-

To unsubscribe send a blank email to
techwr-l-leave -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
or visit

To subscribe, send a blank email to techwr-l-join -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com

Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit for more resources and info.

Looking for articles on Technical Communications? Head over to our online magazine at

Looking for the archived Techwr-l email discussions? Search our public email archives @


FDA (b)anality: From: Chris Morton
Re: FDA (b)anality: From: Bill Swallow
Re: FDA (b)anality: From: Gene Kim-Eng

Previous by Author: RE: FDA (b)anality
Next by Author: RE: FDA (b)anality
Previous by Thread: Re: FDA (b)anality
Next by Thread: Re: FDA (b)anality

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads