Re: FDA (b)anality

Subject: Re: FDA (b)anality
From: Gene Kim-Eng <techwr -at- genek -dot- com>
To: Dan Goldstein <DGoldstein -at- riveraintech -dot- com>
Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2012 14:08:43 -0800

You are a spoilsport. :)

On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 12:36 PM, Dan Goldstein
<DGoldstein -at- riveraintech -dot- com>wrote:

> Hate to spoil the drama, but you won't get a recall over a something
> like that. At most, you might get a written "Notice of Inspectional
> Observations," which indicates what they want you to correct. But I
> think most auditors would just orally suggest that it be corrected and
> leave it at that.

Create and publish documentation through multiple channels with Doc-To-Help.
Choose your authoring formats and get any output you may need. Try
Doc-To-Help, now with MS SharePoint integration, free for 30-days.

You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-

To unsubscribe send a blank email to
techwr-l-leave -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
or visit

To subscribe, send a blank email to techwr-l-join -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com

Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit for more resources and info.

Looking for articles on Technical Communications? Head over to our online magazine at

Looking for the archived Techwr-l email discussions? Search our public email archives @


FDA (b)anality: From: Chris Morton
Re: FDA (b)anality: From: Bill Swallow
Re: FDA (b)anality: From: Gene Kim-Eng
RE: FDA (b)anality: From: Dan Goldstein

Previous by Author: Re: FDA (b)anality
Next by Author: Re: FDA (b)anality
Previous by Thread: RE: FDA (b)anality
Next by Thread: RE: FDA (b)anality

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads