Re: FDA (b)anality

Subject: Re: FDA (b)anality
From: Gene Kim-Eng <techwr -at- genek -dot- com>
To: Paul Goble <pgcommunication -at- gmail -dot- com>
Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2012 11:38:06 -0800

You have more imagination than I do. Short of sharpening the edges of the
CDs and throwing them as ninja weapons or scattering them on a wet floor to
act as substitutes for banana peels, I can't think of any way you could put
anyone in jeopardy from software without first installing it into a

Gene Kim-Eng

On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 11:06 AM, Paul GobleI haven't yet worked on
FDA-regulated medical devices, so I'm curious. It

> probably isn't critical in this case, but I can imagine circumstances where
> using only the official wording could in fact place the user or patient in
> jeopardy.

Create and publish documentation through multiple channels with Doc-To-Help.
Choose your authoring formats and get any output you may need. Try
Doc-To-Help, now with MS SharePoint integration, free for 30-days.

You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-

To unsubscribe send a blank email to
techwr-l-leave -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
or visit

To subscribe, send a blank email to techwr-l-join -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com

Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit for more resources and info.

Looking for articles on Technical Communications? Head over to our online magazine at

Looking for the archived Techwr-l email discussions? Search our public email archives @


FDA (b)anality: From: Chris Morton
Re: FDA (b)anality: From: Milan Davidović
Re: FDA (b)anality: From: Paul Goble

Previous by Author: Re: FDA (b)anality
Next by Author: Re:
Previous by Thread: RE: FDA (b)anality
Next by Thread: RE: FDA (b)anality

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads