RE: RoboHelp 9 vs. Flare 7

Subject: RE: RoboHelp 9 vs. Flare 7
From: "Cardimon, Craig" <ccardimon -at- M-S-G -dot- com>
To: "'McLauchlan, Kevin'" <Kevin -dot- McLauchlan -at- safenet-inc -dot- com>, 'Julie Stickler' <jstickler -at- gmail -dot- com>, "'techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com'" <techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com>
Date: Tue, 7 Feb 2012 17:05:11 +0000

They want it in a handy format (PDF and Word) so they can print it, toss it in their laptop case, stick post-its on it, highlight it with markers, and give impromptu presentations as needed. I maintain separate TOCs. I used to provide WebHelp, but no one ever asked for it, so I just do PDF now.

-----Original Message-----
From: McLauchlan, Kevin [mailto:Kevin -dot- McLauchlan -at- safenet-inc -dot- com]
Sent: mardi 7 février 2012 12:01
To: Cardimon, Craig; 'Julie Stickler'; 'techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com'
Cc: McLauchlan, Kevin
Subject: RE: RoboHelp 9 vs. Flare 7

Do they want it as a handy review format, or do they want to use it/ give it to people who will use it?

If the latter, what prep - beyond creating and organizing a help system - did you invest in order to have a help system come out as a useful Word document? For example, are you maintaining two (or more) separate ToCs? Did you arrange ToCs substantially differently for the different outputs? Do you have to do any "cleanup" of the Word-ish output, before distributing it?

I used to. I stopped providing any output that wasn't WebHelp. But a few people have begun pestering for a PDF version again. So I'm almost ready to scope out how much work I'll need to do to make that happen. Almost.

(I, too, stopped using RH about the time Flare became available. I mostly have not regretted leaving RH but, in hindsight, I might have looked more diligently for another HAT to land in.)

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Cardimon, Craig
> Sent: February-07-12 10:27 AM
> To: 'Julie Stickler'; 'techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com'
> Subject: RE: RoboHelp 9 vs. Flare 7
> I last used RH in 2006, so my judgment on that might be a bit old. The
> different lies in multiple outputs. Around my work, someone always
> wants it in Word. Flare does it. RH was recalcicrant.

The information contained in this electronic mail transmission may be privileged and confidential, and therefore, protected from disclosure. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by replying to this message and deleting it from your computer without copying or disclosing it.

Information contained in this e-mail transmission is privileged and confidential. If you are not the intended recipient of this email, do not read, distribute or reproduce this transmission (including any attachments). If you have received this e-mail in error, please immediately notify the sender by telephone or email reply.

You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-

To unsubscribe send a blank email to
techwr-l-leave -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com

Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit for more resources and info.

Looking for articles on Technical Communications? Head over to our online magazine at

Looking for the archived Techwr-l email discussions? Search our public email archives @

RoboHelp 9 vs. Flare 7: From: Cardimon, Craig
Re: RoboHelp 9 vs. Flare 7: From: Julie Stickler
Re: RoboHelp 9 vs. Flare 7: From: Rick Stone
Re: RoboHelp 9 vs. Flare 7: From: Julie Stickler
RE: RoboHelp 9 vs. Flare 7: From: Cardimon, Craig
RE: RoboHelp 9 vs. Flare 7: From: McLauchlan, Kevin

Previous by Author: RE: Technical Writing and Software Testing
Next by Author: RE: RoboHelp 9 vs. Flare 7
Previous by Thread: RE: RoboHelp 9 vs. Flare 7
Next by Thread: Re: RoboHelp 9 vs. Flare 7

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads