Re: Generic MS Windows Support message

Subject: Re: Generic MS Windows Support message
From: Gene Kim-Eng <techwr -at- genek -dot- com>
To: Peter Neilson <neilson -at- windstream -dot- net>
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2012 10:51:14 -0800

Yes. Back in those days the company I worked for specified each OS their
products were certified for.

Gene Kim-Eng

On Mon, Feb 13, 2012 at 10:30 AM, Peter Neilson <neilson -at- windstream -dot- net>wrote:

> I think this is likely okay now, but IIRC at one time the definition of
> "later" could be tricky. And couldn't something work on 95 and 98, but be
> unusable on NT and 2000?

You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-

To unsubscribe send a blank email to
techwr-l-leave -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com

Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit for more resources and info.

Looking for articles on Technical Communications? Head over to our online magazine at

Looking for the archived Techwr-l email discussions? Search our public email archives @


Re: Generic MS Windows Support message: From: Peter Neilson

Previous by Author: Re: Stupid users (was Re: Is there a term for this?)
Next by Author: Re: current economic difficulties in Florida (was: Here's another winner- guess the pay)
Previous by Thread: Re: Generic MS Windows Support message
Next by Thread: RE: Generic MS Windows Support message

What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads