Re: CareerTrack reviews?

Subject: Re: CareerTrack reviews?
From: Chris Morton <salt -dot- morton -at- gmail -dot- com>
To: techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
Date: Thu, 23 Feb 2012 11:07:46 -0800

LearningTree is probably overkill, but here's the link:

http://www.learningtree.com/training-directory/Writing-Presentation-Skills-Training-21.htm


Mastering Computers was acquired by Platinum Technologies, then CA a number
of years ago and was subsequently disemboweled.

Still, I doubt the CareerTrack seminar would offer much value when compared
to self-study and subscribing to a few RSS feeds devoted to this topic.

> Chris

On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 10:59 AM, Dan Goldstein <DGoldstein -at- riveraintech -dot- com
> wrote:

> If my colleague is still interested in a course, perhaps you could
> recommend one of those first-rate companies.
>
> My colleague is interested in acquiring self-editing skills, not in
> editing others' work. CareerTrack's course claims to be appropriate for
> this purpose, but I suspect that other companies might serve it better.
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Chris Morton
> Sent: Thursday, February 23, 2012 1:43 PM
> To: techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
> Subject: Re: CareerTrack reviews?
>
> I was a presenter for two companies in the seminar business back in the
> '90s. I followed CareerTrack as best as I could, thinking that they may
> be a future employer of mine should the need ever arise to jump ship.
> Through my own informal study of them, I determined that that theirs was
> a third-rate program when compared to the companies with which I was
> affiliated. Ultimately, it became readily apparent that it would have
> been a huge comedown to ever have hooked up with them.
>
> Once I left the seminar field, my wife took one of their courses (I
> forget the title) and was underwhelmed. Her experience confirmed
> everything that I had long suspected about CareerTrack.
>
> I believe your cohort would be far better served to do a self-study,
> relying on published volumes. Then he (she) should equip himself with
> the standard volumes, e.g., *Chicago Manual of Style*, *Strunk & White*,
> *The Gregg Reference Manual*, et al.
>
> I believe that the best proofreaders inherently possess the skill and
> cannot really be trained (except in relation to certain grammar
> nuances).
> If he is a regular newspaper/website reader and can instantly spot
> errors without trying, then proofreading is a good avenue for him. If he
> has to pick it up from scratch and--as an adult--is not already both
> detail-oriented and a bit of a "grammar snob", then he shouldn't
> consider this role. The best proofreaders are also avid readers, being
> the type who most often has his nose into some printed material if
> eating alone.
>
>
>
>
>
> This message contains confidential information intended only for the use
> of the addressee(s). If you are not the addressee, or the person
> responsible for delivering it to the addressee, you are hereby notified
> that reading, disseminating, distributing, copying, electronic storing or
> the taking of any action in reliance on the contents of this message is
> strictly prohibited. If you have received this message by mistake, please
> notify us, by replying to the sender, and delete the original message
> immediately thereafter. Thank you.
>
>
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> Create and publish documentation through multiple channels with
> Doc-To-Help. Choose your authoring formats and get any output you may need.
>
> Try Doc-To-Help, now with MS SharePoint integration, free for 30-days.
>
> http://bit.ly/doc-to-help
>
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>
> You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as salt -dot- morton -at- gmail -dot- com -dot-
>
> To unsubscribe send a blank email to
> techwr-l-leave -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com
>
>
> Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit
> http://www.techwhirl.com/email-discussion-groups/ for more resources and
> info.
>
> Looking for articles on Technical Communications? Head over to our online
> magazine at http://techwhirl.com
>
> Looking for the archived Techwr-l email discussions? Search our public
> email archives @ http://techwr-l.com/archives
>

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Create and publish documentation through multiple channels with Doc-To-Help. Choose your authoring formats and get any output you may need.

Try Doc-To-Help, now with MS SharePoint integration, free for 30-days.

http://bit.ly/doc-to-help

^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

You are currently subscribed to TECHWR-L as archive -at- web -dot- techwr-l -dot- com -dot-

To unsubscribe send a blank email to
techwr-l-leave -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com


Send administrative questions to admin -at- techwr-l -dot- com -dot- Visit
http://www.techwhirl.com/email-discussion-groups/ for more resources and info.

Looking for articles on Technical Communications? Head over to our online magazine at http://techwhirl.com

Looking for the archived Techwr-l email discussions? Search our public email archives @ http://techwr-l.com/archives


Follow-Ups:

References:
CareerTrack reviews?: From: Dan Goldstein
Re: CareerTrack reviews?: From: Chris Morton
RE: CareerTrack reviews?: From: Dan Goldstein

Previous by Author: Re: CareerTrack reviews?
Next by Author: Re: CareerTrack reviews?
Previous by Thread: RE: CareerTrack reviews?
Next by Thread: RE: CareerTrack reviews?


What this post helpful? Share it with friends and colleagues:

Sponsored Ads


Sponsored Ads