TechWhirl (TECHWR-L) is a resource for technical writing and technical communications professionals of all experience levels and in all industries to share their experiences and acquire information.
For two decades, technical communicators have turned to TechWhirl to ask and answer questions about the always-changing world of technical communications, such as tools, skills, career paths, methodologies, and emerging industries. The TechWhirl Archives and magazine, created for, by and about technical writers, offer a wealth of knowledge to everyone with an interest in any aspect of technical communications.
Subject:image resizing better with Word 10 than Gimp? From:"Rebecca Edmondson" <beckyed -at- rcn -dot- com> To:<techwr-l -at- lists -dot- techwr-l -dot- com> Date:Fri, 30 Mar 2012 10:04:38 -0400
I am hoping someone can explain this mystery to me: I've discovered that
Word 10 does a way better job of resizing jpgs than Gimp. My target jpgs are
illustrations of an instrument with some fairly fine detail, but they are
too big-I need to reduce them from 18 inches wide to 5 inches wide.
If I insert the original image into a Word file, it comes in at 6 inches
(35% of its size) and with all the detail preserved. If I grab a screenshot
of it with Hypersnap, the screenshot looks great.
If I open the image in Gimp and scale it to 6 inches, then open the scaled
image in Word, it's fuzzy.
Anyone able to explain this?
Create and publish documentation through multiple channels with Doc-To-Help. Choose your authoring formats and get any output you may need.
Try Doc-To-Help, now with MS SharePoint integration, free for 30-days.